Thursday, February 2, 2012

Kino on fear, pain, injury, and that recent NYT article (and my two cents on Elephant Journal Editorship)

I just read Kino's latest article, which was published in Elephant Journal. At one point in her article, she speaks very clearly and illuminatingly about the place of pain, suffering and potential injury in the Ashtanga tradition. She also addresses that recently-infamous NYT article (you know what I'm talking about; no need to link to it here :-)). Kino writes:

"Yoga is an ancient spiritual tradition, of which the practice of physical postures, known as asanas, are just one component. In Patanjali’s Yoga Sutras asana is in fact only one out of the full eight limbs of practice. Recent dialogue within the yoga community, most notably in the New York Times article on yoga-related injuries, presents the notion that yoga might be potentially discounted because of the risk of physical injury. Yet this fails to take into account the spiritual journey to the heart of each student’s essential nature that is at center of the yoga practice itself. A true student of yoga is a sincere spiritual seeker and is willing to go through the work of pain, suffering and potential injury if that road ultimately leads to liberation, happiness, healing and freedom. My teacher Sri K. Pattabhi Jois said that if you experienced an injury during your physical yoga practice the only real way to heal that injury was through more yoga. He also said that if you quit your practice after having experienced that injury that it would stay with you for a long time, perhaps the rest of your life. If pain can be avoided by students learning their lessons the easy way through an open heart, healthy alignment and accepting attitude that is the fastest road. However, when pain and injury arise it is crucial that you do not run from them nor allow their presence to rule your experience of your body, your practice and your life.


There is a mind-body connection that underlies the practice of physical postures. Yoga is more of a body awareness technique than a physical exercise routine. In fact the main purpose of all the postures is to prepare your body and mind for deeper states of realization. When you try to feel and awaken a forgotten area of the body for the first time it is often hard to rouse. Yoga students must use the posture to dig deeper into the layers of the body and reach through memories, emotions, thoughts and anything else to touch the heart of their human soul with all its foibles and vulnerabilities. In the path of yoga it is essential that when pain arises you do not run from it, reacting to the pain from a purely psychological perspective and throw out the whole tradition based on fear. In fact, when you do experience pain it is sometimes a better teacher of the inner work that happens along the path of yoga. Any injuries that arise can be used to learn a deeper lesson about life so that then actually the path of yoga is truly working from a broader perspective.
Editor’s note: that said, fear and pain can be two different things. If a yoga posture is hurting you, this can be dangerous. Needless to say, we hope! Being macho and pushing through is not the message here. ~ ed.
When you accept yoga as a spiritual path the notion of the need for “safety” is challenged. You have the confidence to let yourself fall with the full faith that one day you will catch yourself in the air. Think of the yogi as a brave warrior going on a long and epic journey to the center of the soul. Just as in every heroic epic there are fearsome, painful and worrying battles that test the limits of the hero’s ability, so too in yoga are there challenging, difficult and nearly impossible postures that test the limits of your body and mind. But if you are the hero who is committed to the whole journey, then you also have the heart to see the experience all the way through to the end and win your final freedom."

I hope you find Kino's words here to be as enlightening as I have I found them.

And now I'm going to go off on a little rant here. If you don't like rants, please feel free to just skip this paragraph altogether. I feel compelled to say something here about that Editor's note that popped up in the middle of Kino's words. While I'm sure the editors have perfectly good intentions in inserting that note, there's a part of me that can't help feeling that it is (a) rather disrespectful to Kino, and (b) rather insulting to the discerning ability of the reader. First, if somebody were giving a speech, for instance, you wouldn't think of interrupting her speech to deliver your own commentary on it, would you? Moreover, what Kino is saying here seems sensible enough: It's not as if she's asking people to go throw themselves over a cliff! Besides, I'm pretty sure Elephant Journal has published articles with much more questionable content before: I don't seem to recall the esteemed editors inserting any editor's notes in those cases. So why the double standard here? Why do our esteemed editors suddenly feel the need here to be self-appointed arbiters of public yoga safety standards? In any case, isn't this unceremonious insertion of editor's notes at odds with Elephant Journal's professed policy of openness and being embracing of diverse viewpoints?

End of rant. Thank you for bearing with (or not bearing with) this rant. Yoga in the Dragon's Den will presently resume its usual friendly, non-ranty, (hopefully) non-preachy voice. 

13 comments:

  1. Yeah, that editorial note was what my mom calls gauche. Bet let's remember EJ is staffed with volunteers who are not necessarily seasoned journalistic professionals

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "let's remember EJ is staffed with volunteers who are not necessarily seasoned journalistic professionals"

      This is true. Another reason to have paid employees, in my opinion. Maybe I'm being very old-school, but I always believe that people who are paid for their work (and who thus have a tangible stake in it) are more likely to give their work more attention.

      Oh, and I just looked up the meaning of "gauche" on the online dictionary. Thanks for helping me learn a new word :-)

      Delete
  2. Nobel, we seem to be firing on the same wavelength. Including on the ed. note -- which I thought actually missed Kino's point. I thought the message was you do need to be a bit macho!

    (Also, I've been having a little trouble posting comments here. I meant to say something on your injury piece, too.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I just went over to your blog and read your latest post on the same topic. Very nice. Yes, it does seem that we are firing on the same wavelength :-)

      Delete
  3. Hi Nobel,

    I'm reading your blog for quite some time. I like the way you write about yoga and many things. I know how much you like Kino. I had an opportunity to study with her - she's nice person, full of energy. However her approach towards pain and her strong adjustments is, well, silly (forgive me). She advised a friend of mine to push through pain - in result her meniscus was torn. Pain is clear signal from the body saying we're doing something wrong or that the body isn't ready for a given posture. However many teachers try to force a student into a posture to help him in heaving an "opening" or breakthrough. I feel people should listen in first place to their bodies and their pain receptors not to teachers who try to force them to push through pain in the name of tradition.

    Jorgen

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Jorgen,
      thanks for sharing. I'm sorry to hear your friend was injured. I do not get the sense that Kino is asking people to push through pain. But then again, I wasn't with your friend when whatever happened happened, so I really can't say much. Yes, I do agree that we should listen to our bodies.

      Delete
  4. Hey Nobel
    Rant away my friend:) Read that post, LOVE Kino, she helps me so much.

    ReplyDelete
  5. did you see the clip of Kino breaking down how to jump into chatturganga from pincha?!! Looks sooo easy...ppffft! I'm working on just staying in it, I haven't even gotten my head round exiting in any way that's fancy, just so i don't wipeout too awfully:) ok, so I'm busting to tell someone and you my friend will appreciate this, I usually do not talk about my practice as things(asanas) come and they go like um magic:) but today...I came up into Sirsasana with straight legs....twice, just to make sure it was real(haha) This may not be a big deal for some however as I have been recouperating from an auto accident for the past 2 1/2 yrs and could not even imagine a headstand again, this my friend is huge to me:) Thanks for the opportunity to share!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Congratulations, JayaK, on your breakthrough in Sirsasana :-) I did not know that you have been recuperating from an auto accident. As somebody who is working with an injury, you have my greatest respect.

      Well, since we're all talking asana, I'll share something too. When I was at Kino's workshop in Richmond, VA, last April, I was able to get into Pincha, but always "chickened out" when it came time to exit the pose: Instead of exiting in the standard way, I would lower my legs primly to the mat first, and then go into chaturanga. Kino really got on my case on that! She suggested working with the "training wheels" version of the exit (I haven't seen the video, but I think she probably includes that in her breakdown of it). After the workshop, I really got in the swing of really getting the standard pincha exit, and nailed it within a few weeks. In fact, I just did it again in practice this morning! It probably doesn't look half as easy or graceful as Kino's exit, but it's there: I hopped my elbows off the mat in pincha, and landed on my hands and toes in pincha just before my face hit the ground!

      You see how you have unleashed the Ashtangeek in me? :-)

      Delete
  6. EJ's editing and focus leave much to be desired. Last year, I wrote this piece, about some of what I saw.

    http://dangerousharvests.blogspot.com/2011/08/elephant-journals-got-issues.html

    I mostly quit reading EJ after all of that. They have some good writers, but overall, I find a lot of the content lacking depth and designed for sound-byte drama.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Nathan, I read your piece when you first published it on your blog. Very insightful. I also learnt a lot from the dialogue that ensued in the comment thread.

      Delete